The goal of any language is to communicate your ideas to another; it does not matter which language you speak. Just as spoken languages rely on grammar to ensure mutual understanding, programming languages rely on coding standards to maintain clarity. Imagine someone says, “Me good.” You might get the idea, but it’s not correct English. Similarly, a line of code like console.log("hi) might still be understood by the programmer, but it breaks the language’s formal rules and could cause problems for others (especially for the compiler).
Language can be learned in two primary ways: through formal education or through immersive experience. Classroom learning emphasizes spelling and grammar, offering a structured approach that can be replicated. In contrast, experiential learning, often gained through daily interactions, prioritizes effective communication over strict adherence to rules.
Both methods have their advantages. Classroom instruction provides a systematic foundation, while real-world practice develops fluency and adaptability. Neither method is sufficient on its own… However, together they create a well-rounded, fluent understanding of the language.
The same principle applies to programming. Strict rules and tools like ESLint in JavaScript or TypeScript provide the grammatical backbone of coding, preventing chaos and ensuring consistency across projects. At the same time, hands-on coding with peers teaches practical problem-solving and flexibility. Without both, programmers risk either producing unreadable or rigid code that lacks creativity.
Ultimately, coding standards are not about limiting expression but about enhancing communication and professionalism. Like any natural language, programming standards thrive when structure and flexibility work hand in hand.